Re: Rules of Magick? By: RubyElysian / Beginner Jan 03, 2018
Post # 2
Every path or tradition has different 'rules' or more like guidelines to follow, such as the Wiccan Rede 'An ye harm none, do what ye will' which means do what you want as long as no harm comes of it. But Magick itself is universal and generally it's only rules are that of the physical realm. For example you cannot use Magick to do things that we know to be impossible such as flying, shape shifting, telepathy, shooting fire balls of hands, etc. And I hear talk of 'reversing spells' but in my personal experience spells have to run their course for them to be done, eventually they will wear down and typically the energy used to cast them will become depleted unless the spell is continuously recharged.
Re: Rules of Magick? By: Vozel / Beginner Jan 04, 2018
Post # 3
Honestly, there really isn't any rules to magic unless you're following a certain religionor tradition.
Anywho, I'll link some information on spells and everything to help you on your way to learning and discovering magic.
Starting Out: http://www.spellsofmagic.com/read_post.html?post=71692
The Basics Expanded: http://www.spellsofmagic.com/read_post.html?post=483942
Magical Correspondences: http://www.spellsofmagic.com/read_post.html?post=819642
Studying Tips and Advice: http://www.spellsofmagic.com/read_post.html?post=876458
Pointers on Spells: http://www.spellsofmagic.com/read_post.html?post=873455
How to Write a Spell: http://www.spellsofmagic.com/read_post.html?post=829629
Troubleshooting Spells: http://www.spellsofmagic.com/read_post.html?post=846276
If you any questions you can always shoot me a message! :) Good-luck!
Re: Rules of Magick? By: Lark Moderator / Knowledgeable Jan 04, 2018
Post # 4
There are the Traditional Laws of Magic which do apply pretty much across the board to any magical working. Although I would question the inclusion of the ThreeFold return mentioned here.
Traditional "Laws of Magic"
These are some of the "laws" that real-world occult traditions have applied to the working of magic. They can be contentious and do not exist in all traditions, and this is an indicative rather than a definitive list:
The Law of Contagion : Once together, always together or The part of the thing is the whole of the thing : A part of something - like one of someone's possessions or a part of their body - can be used to work magic on it over a distance as though it were physically present. The more intimate the connection the better the link works so a discarded cigarette packet is little use, whilst a favourite shirt or piece ofjewelryis better and part of someone is ideal1.
The Law of Sympathy or Attraction : Like attracts like or The image is the thing : Where a contagion isn't possible an image of the target may be used instead. The better the image, the better the link - and even better if the target has personally endorsed the image. Signed photos are really good for this. Combining sympathy and contagion is the basis ofPoppet Magic.
The Law of Correspondence : Things look like what they are or as above, so below : This is the basis of astrological magic (that things correspond with their astrological profile) and can also be used to identify usefulherbs and suchlike (if it looks right, or has the same astrological profile as your target, it probably helps). Something similar lies behind the (discredited) theology of the Doctrine of Signatures . It's a toss-up as to whether the use of a target'snamein a working is Correspondence or Sympathy - depends who you ask.
The Law of Consent : No injury is done to the willing or this works a lot easier with your co-operation : Depending on who you ask, this is either about the idea that magic is said to have difficulty effecting those who do not believe in it and/or about the idea that it is possible to consciously resist magic and it is far easier to operate a working upon someone who consents to be targeted than someone who doesn't. The concept of thehumbugis said to take advantage of this.
Equivalent Exchange : Everything has a price : Magic conserves a given level of value (although one or both "parties" may have different ideas of how something is valued) and a given effect must be paid for with something of at least equal worth. Part of the fun of magic where this applies is making absolutely sure you understand what you are paying before you seal the deal. This also tends to lead to magic that takes the path of least resistance, moving stuff about rather than creating it and what have you. Where the price is far more than the benefit, you're probably enteringmonkey's pawterritory.
Reciprocity (aka. " The Law of Triples "): Whatever you do by magic, for good or ill will be repaid to you threefold : Based on the idea that the universe is "karmic" and rewards or punishes the use of magic. Fervently believed by many people but mostly nothing more than wishful thinking by those who think that there is a difference between "white" and "black" magic2. However , particularly when dealing with things likeshamanisticpractice,maleficiumand other "hostile" magics will put you into contact with the sort of spirits that enjoy that sort of thing, meaning they can find you and effect you much more easily and they are rarely the sort ofspiritsyou want finding you and effecting you even without the encouragement of a hostile worker.
Reversal : Whatever magic does, magic can undo : Somewhat controversial, the idea that anything created by magic can be dispelled or otherwise undone by magic without needing to be physically destroyed.
Distortion : Magic changes nothing permanently : Even more controversial than the "Law" of Reversal, the idea that magic works by bending the universe out of shape but does not actually change it - sooner or later the world will snap back into its original shape. This is a good mechanism for causingno ontological inertiaandexplosive breakageof magical phenomena but does not fit with everyone's experience of magic.
The Law of Balance : In the end, everything balances out : Very much related to the laws of equivalent exchange and reciprocity, this idea suggests that magic cannot create or destroy anything, but must move it from place to place (or time to time) - so good fortune now must be repaid by bad fortune later, restoring life to someone means taking it from someone else that sort of thing. Again, not fully attested to by any magical tradition but popular in various mythiea regardless. Known to modern cynics as "the Marxist theory of magic".
Backlash : If you don't know where it's pointed, it's pointed at you : Some traditions hold that once a magical working is started - especially a working of the harmful variety - it needs to go somewhere . There are likely to be ways and means of safely "earthing" an aborted working (if you can get them right and have the chance to do so), but more worrying still are those workings which miss their target and/or snap back because they are resisted or reflected. Death spells are especially notorious for rebounding on the caster if they fail to kill the target3. Such traditions may well develop ways of passing the damage onto someone else - especially the clients of those casters performing this kind of sending for hire or reward. This is the sort of context in which you need to be absolutely sure of your targeting data before you start your attack.
You might also want to read Isaac Bonewits' article on the Laws of Magick at