|
You're really going to try this now?
O.k, I'll play along with your game of trying to make me look bad in that you will look smart. I've dealt with plenty of people like you before.
--
Read my posts in this thread, you'll see that I am not ignorant to the fact that color is used to merely categorize magick.
Also, you'll notice that yes, magick can be considered only one ''type'' therefore no true types in that it is referred to as magick.
Although, they're many, many, many subgroups of magick that are so effectively different that there is indeed... different ''types'.
If you really knew magick as well as you think you do, you would have given me resources to back yourself up, you would have more proof on your side rather than just your own perspective and you would have proven me wrong with more than just resorting to acting like I don't know what I'm talking about.
If you really want to play THAT game, I'll take some hits at your spelling and grammar proving that you aren't quite the sharpest tack in the bunch.
Even as that would have helped me in the eyes of others, I didn't take a hit at your less than desired knowledge of the english language, instead I was using proof and knowledge that about 3 other people in this thread has agreed with.
|