Walking on a tight rope, hypothetically and philosophically, even those who claim to claim not, don't exactly know just as those who ask. In all rhetorical disposition, it is quite hypocritical, and knowing by knowing this is counterintuitive. It is only rational, logical, common sense and gives a remedial dose of intellectual testicular fortitude to the inquirer, and an infamous spoil of ego to the face of the so called, "renown."
Silly: hypocritical. Fluffy: infamous. Egoistical: renowned. Knowledgeable: pious.
Is there such a thing as silliness? You be the judge.