|
So they leave big tracks, then can you tell me how these creatures work, either in a hypothetical or in a words on Philosophy context, because it is self-evident that the general consensus is prominent, but I having a hard time to understanding your grammatical logic. Yeah. . . I agree with Coyote and Personified too. Yeah, logic is a blindfold to those who claim it.
We all know "other beings" are fantasy, but what is the logic behind the fantasy, in the fantasy itself? Some are wanting to know how "other creatures" "leave big tracks," because some want to learn this "other beings" mythology. It's captivating, it is fantasy for intellectual thought, it is fantasy unexplained-explained for the mythological reasoning, in a hypothetical context; it is the cats meow, Iisbach. It is the logic in the common sense, that some are looking for, so "people these days" can reason with themselves.
That means giving reasons and stories, as to why, how, possibly when and where, as to what in which way, "other beings" might be in and are in mythology, that makes up mythology, in a mythological context alone, as fantasy for the inquirer, so that when someone. . .
So that when someone claims to claim not, there is at least some reasoning for the prominent unreasoning, that is so intellectually inflated in its manner.
You tell everyone something that isn't so, before people even walk in the door, you've already lost their vote. It is called speaking too soon, and mothers' school children don't buy it, when their children come home to tell their mommies that they didn't specifically do anything bad at school that day, when in fact that the child has.
Children of somesort of god, I salute you, in your persuasiveness to tell the truth right, for brownie points.
Well, I said words on Philosophy, but what was really saved for philosophy, in the context that it was implied, "Philosophy on words," was exactly right. I think someone just missed the whole implicit implication, on what may have been truly implied; thus, rhetorically portrayed.
What is out there is intellectual inflation, by those who hold the un-intellectualized thought forms, pervasive as the norm. That is what other spirits are out their: intellectually inflated spiritual larva. And as spiritual larva is, it's said to really have no intelligence, in truth. Spiritual larva is one of the categorizations of many other categories of spirits.
Kabal, and I love the name, what do you say, if someone creates a composed compilation of articles on the hypothetical and philosophical abstract concepts within and for fantasy in mythology, for mythology. So that true logical meaning and common sense comes to mind, when knowing, by the study of mythology, one is only wishing to practice a fantasy ritual or two, so all the fluffs can have their wake of excitement and be done with it, and so as intellectual inflation alters to a fluffy stop.
In all hands-down explicitness, there are some that would wish to go deep into a field, where the study behind the "other creatures" that "leave big tracks," are joined together at the magicians girdle, for fantasy spells, for study; for the sake of knowledge, mainly in mythology itself.
It is going to be great, compiling knowledge on how it was that "other creatures" that "leave big tracks" left their tracks, in a historical, hypothetical and philosophical context for mythology, for the sake of just knowing your mythology that is. Now, that I say I think about it, no one hasn't posted anything really on any in-depth mythology, nor has asked any questions about it.
One last note. There is a pattern to the question about other creatures, even in the spiritual sense, that if they exist, and when it comes to the spirit world, it's either they exist or they don't exist, because you can't have both answers, in something that is as actual and real as the spirit world itself. It's conflicting. Just as to what types of spiritual beings are out there, are written in books, can be seen while on the astral plane, but specifically speaking that is anybody's argument, and apparently, anybodies guess. . . Meow.
|
