An atomic bomb does not destroy matter. It splits the particles into smaller portions, releasing the energy stored within said particle.
Nothing is destroyed in an explosion, simply changed. Nothing is created in an explosion, simply derived from something that preceeded it.
Think of it like cracking open an egg, onto a frying pan. The yolk and whites inside are the stored energy. When you crack it open, they are released. This would be the explostion. You still have to halves of the shell, and you still have the yolk, but it becomes cooked and changes form.
Matter can not be created, nor destoyed. Only changed .
We can not create fire with our mind.
Perhaps telekinesis is possible, but very improbable .
I'm not sure how to put it any more simply than I already have. The egg analogy was very clear, and rudimentary. If you can not understand that, I suggest you ask a chemistry teacher what happens when an atom or nucleus is split, they will be able to explain it much more simple manner.
I'm not saying that fireballs are possible but creating fire doesn't go against the law of matter cannot be created nor destroyed. Some believe pyrokenisis is possible which to me means channelling and manipulating evergy, which we know is possible, and heat to ignite a substance. Oxygen fuels fire and is literally flammable so I think that if pyrokenisis is possible fireballs might be if one was able to create flame and then alter its shape via teleknisis though I know this isn't probable. Like Personified I have also heard of glamours that make someone less noticeable though not invisible. I doubt a human could do it but who knows what is possible with a extreme energy manipulation talent. Energy is constantly changing forms is my main thought here so if one could manipulate energy on a grand scale anything might be possible but I doubt it's something the human mind and/or body could handle. Maybe in years to come we will evolve to such a state.
I read Nimiraj's post about atomic bombs and destroying matter and knew exactly what I was going to post in response to that.
I switched the page and Maelstrom was already right on top of it. Well said bro. ^_^
Amity please reread that post I didn't post that about an atomic bomb creating or destroying. I wrote the nonsense about pyrokenisis which might in some alternate universe be possible, but not the bit about the atomic bomb. I've seen specials about it too many times to not know how it works. Man the military channel is boring but I digress.
ALL spells are 'possible'. It is the experience of the 'caster' that controls the outcome. Of course as you stated a 'novice' cannot do things an exp witch can. My question tho is why would someone 'need' a fireball much less 'invisibility ? The nature thing was posed tho no real witch would venture out into wilderness 'without' the proper tools. As for invisibility why use it/need it etc etc......
Fortunately your seriously misinformed post was removed, Nimiraj.
Spellcaster, not every spell is what you'd consider "possible" and the vast majority of magic runs along side the laws of nature. It does not matter how much "power" (as you referenced in another thread) one has they will not be able to say, become a toaster oven, open a hatch in their chest, and bake me some cookies. It's just not going to happen anytime soon.
Everyone is capable of the same things in magic, though experience does often assist in how successful someone is at what they're doing. Just because someone has been practicing for ages doesn't make them much more capable of becoming that toaster oven than a "novice".
Once again I didn't make that post misinformed or otherwise so please learn to read correctly. I made two posts above neither which have been removed and one of which like this one was referring to not having made that post. I only noticed your irritating comment as I was checking back to see if you realized you were referring to the wrong person, but instead you imply I'm a liar by ignoring the fact that I said I didn't make that post. Ignorance is bliss I guess.
