The Truth of "ForceCraft"

Forums ► General Info ► The Truth of "ForceCraft"

The Truth of "ForceCraft"
By:
Post # 1

Hello to youonce more. I shall be brief in this post and explain to you what is meant by the term: "ForceCraft".

As yeshould bewell aware, magick is technically the use of the willpower to obtain physical feats, in its purest form (as stated by Crowley). Now "ForceCraft" is verbal magick; it is IN NO WAY the saying of certain words that hold "magickal value" [queue the spooky music and howling wolf!] , it is actually quite difficult to do, especially if one wants physical results. The formula for making "ForceCraft" successful is actually this: Intent+Focus+Catalyst=Desired Result. Now:

Intent: this is what thou wantest to happen in your mind; let us start with something basic and quite stereotypical--a "fireball". In thy mind, thou seest a small ball of fire.

Focus: this is the part where thou implementest an incredible amount of concentration on the desired magickal feat (in this case a fireball). Thou shouldst see the desired result as plainly as thou seest thine hand in front of thee.

Catalyst: as you should know by now, magick is very scientific (just highly advanced doth it be). Now, in a chemical reaction, there is always a catalyst; it is what initiates the reaction. For example, let us take a vacuumchamber and in 2/3 of it place Hydrogen gas and in the remaining 1/3 place Oxygen gas; we want Water, which is a 2:1 ratio. Now, the gases will merely sit there until we pass a spark through the chamber. Once this is done, there will be an explosion and then we shall notice that the tube is covered with Water vapor. In this case, the spark was the catalyst. Now, in verbal magick, your words will be the catalyst. Now, note that this "catalyst" is useless without the correct amount of intent and focus involved. You must be 100%+ sure that what you want is going to happen...not that it "might", or "hopefully will" either! Now, then the words simply help to "activate" the process. Let us take our "fireball"; provided that we have enough intent and focus and just know that it will happen, then we simply must use the words that we well associate with the concept of a "fireball". We want this "fireball" in our hands. If we speak English as a primary language, we should probably say something like, "In mine hand a fireball is!!" or something to that effect. If we speak Spanish, it would be best to say, "Pelota de fuego, en este mano, ahora la es!". and French: "Balle de fue, en cette main, aujourd'hui ilest!"--you get the ganeral idea. Now, another idea, if it helps you concentrate, is to say it in an ancient language such as Latin (PILAM DE IGNIS, IN HAEC MANIBUS, ID EST) or Sanscrit ( agni kanduka tadh pani asyaaM (a')sti |)that has sentimental, and revered meaning to you.

If all of these things have been properly done, then you should now have a fireball in your hand! :)

PLEASE NOTE: THE EXAMPLE GIVEN [OF A "FIREBALL"] WAS PURELY FOR STEREOTYPICAL AND HYPOTHETICAL MEANS ONLY. DO NOT ATTEMPT TO MAKE A FIREBALL BECAUSETHOU SHALTFAIL AND THINK LIFE SUCKS AND I LIED TO THEE! OVER YEARS OF STUDY,THOU SHALT BEGIN TO BE ABLE TO CAUSE PHYSICAL REALITIES THROUGH THE USE OF VERBAL MAGICKS/FORCECRAFT! ALMOST ANYTHING THOU DOST IN THE BEGINNING SHALL BE A(N) SPIRITUAL/ASTRAL WORLD WORK OF MAGICK. THE REASON IS BECAUSE THE LEVELS OF OF INTENT AND FOCUS REQUIRED ARE "OFF THE CHARTS", WE MAY SAY!

That was my disclaimer. Thank you for reading it.

--THUNOR

Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: The Truth of "ForceCraft"
By:
Post # 2

If you have any questions, feel free to Mail me--I WILL answer.

--THUNOR

Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: The Truth of "ForceCraft"
By:
Post # 3
o.O a new fancy term for what most of us already do. Energy manipulation. Guess what force craft is nothing new other than the term that i find rather dumb to say the least. All spell working is exactly as what you describe as "force craft" It involves direct energy manipulation with your intent. That's it nothing new about the concept. Magick as intent/ or will with energy manipulation to put it into the universe, but not necessarily will power because that's more of a term used to overcome an obstacle rather than to get your desire in the end. So just to be clear I would really suggest reading into just plain old magick instead of coming up with a new term for something well experienced practitioners do already :)
Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: The Truth of "ForceCraft"
By: / Knowledgeable
Post # 4
Quite so. This is generally the same old, same old, watered down with new terminology and sprinkled with words like "doth" and "scientific" to make it seem official.

I've discussed this with you before Thunor. I have misgivings.
Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: The Truth of "ForceCraft"
By:
Post # 5
Now i get why you really do not like more "new age" terms lol. and yes me and thunor here has went round and round before over this star wars concept.
Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: The Truth of "ForceCraft"
By:
Post # 6

"Now, in a chemical reaction, there is always a catalyst; it is what initiates the reaction."

If you are going to use scientific terms, use the correct ones. A catalyst is some thing that speeds up or slows down a chemical reaction and does not get used up itself. (from Google and my science teacher lol).

Here is a nice link: http://www.chem4kids.com/files/react_catalyst.html

Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: The Truth of "ForceCraft"
By:
Post # 7

First off, the term ForceCraft can be found just by Googling it and it is not a term I came up with, try it: Google "ForceCraft" and see all of the many results that you get.

Secondly: Espirit, no offense, but I don't care what you Googled for the term catalyst. A catalyst by the Merriam-Webster dictionary is not only what you said, but also ( [italics] is my commentary): an agent that provokes [begins, "to arise to a feeling or action"] or speeds significant change or action. Also, if you will look at my [scientific] example, you shall see the meaning of the term in action.

--THUNOR

Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: The Truth of "ForceCraft"
By:
Post # 8

That is the second definition and it did not pertain to chemical reaction like the first one did. If you looked at the link, they use the same example with the proper use of the word and made it less verbose.

Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: The Truth of "ForceCraft"
By: / Knowledgeable
Post # 9
It's not a name you come up with, but it's still a new, needless name for the same old, same old.

The further, needless dilution of old practices. This advances nothing.
Login or Signup to reply to this post.

Re: The Truth of "ForceCraft"
By:
Post # 10

Just to look at what Merriam Online Dictionary says:

1) a substance that enables a chemical reaction to proceed at a usually faster rate or under different conditions (as at a lower temperature) than other wise possible

2) an agent that provokes or speeds significant change or action

I do not see anything in the second definition about a chemical reaction. ;)

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/catalyst

Login or Signup to reply to this post.